You Don’t Have To Eat 6 Times A Day

I’m going to let you in on a little secret. This might rock your world: You don’t have to eat 6 times a day.

I’ll give you a moment to recover, take as long as you need.

You okay? (Fanning you with a piece of paper). Don’t worry, I’ll explain. And, yes the world still is round.

Over the last couple decades, it was the standard weight loss advice to eat 6 meals a day (or three meals and three snacks, or every three hours). Millions of people have been carting around their pre-packed tupperware, dutifully washing a Mt. Everest sized pile of dishes each day, and making sure to eat every few hours, lest they (gasp!) crash their metabolism. Not hungry? People thought they should eat anyway, because it’s time. Still hungry after those 3 ounces of chicken? That’s okay, just get through a couple hours and you can have another 3 ounces. It wasn’t necessarily awesome, but it was livable. I should know. I did it.

Clearing the Myths

The small, frequent meal idea was based on just two supposed benefits:

  1. Your metabolism will be higher if you eat small frequent meals.
  2. Eat more often and you won’t get too hungry and overeat.

Problem though: those aren’t actually true. Either of them.

Your metabolism does go up a bit when you eat, but that amount (known as the thermic effect of food or TEF) is proportional to the size of the meal. That means whether you eat 1800 calories spread over six meals (300 calories each) or 1800 calories in 3 meals (600 calories each), you’ll torch the same 180 calories from digesting, assimilating and storing those nutrients.

So if we won’t screech to a metabolic standstill if we go a few hours without a snack, what about getting too hungry?

There’s evidence that eating small meals and snacks actually doesn’t suppress hunger as well as eating a satisfying meal. You may not feel overly hungry when you have a snack to eat every few hours, but you also never really feel satisfied. And that chronic, mildly sub-satisfied feeling is a constant stress to the brain, body and mind. Many people who eat 6 meals per day fixate on food. They are always thinking about when their next meal will be, what they’ll eat, if they should have 2 ounces of sweet potato or if the carbohydrates would be better spent on a tiny portion of oatmeal, or if they might do one at the 4:00 feeding and one at the 7:00 feeding… if you’re smiling, this is probably sounding familiar.

An amazing thing happens to the brain when the body gets enough food at one time to be satisfied. I don’t mean stuffed, just enough food to be completely comfortable and sated.

The food obsession quiets. You get a long stretch of hours before you need to eat again. It gets food off your mind so you can actually, you know…live your life.

You might be happy with eating 6 meals a day. You might like it and be getting great results. If so, I’m the last person who would try to convince you to change what’s working. But if you’re stuck at a plateau and would like more fat loss progress, or your life feels like it’s revolving around food a bit too much for your liking, I’d like to propose that you don’t have to eat small, frequent meals. You might some substantial advantages to trying out a strategy of fewer meals, eaten to satisfaction.

Those close to me know that I decided to try a fewer-but-larger meal pattern after more than a decade of the old school 6 meals a day pattern. Most of my life I had been packing my mini meals of meat and veggies or eating a protein bar every 3 hours or so. That’s what I thought lean people did. And when I adjusted to fewer larger meals?  Not having to exert constant willpower to stop a little short of satisfaction felt amazing. I used to finish one “meal” and be already thinking about the next. I thought something was wrong with me. Why was I always hungry, seemingly obsessed with food? Changing to 3 or 4 meals per day, and eating to satisfaction at each changed all that. Getting satisfied gave me 5-6 hours after a meal when I didn’t even think about food.

Aaaaand I accidentally got leaner by a few percent body fat. Effortlessly. With less hunger and lot less dishes. I’ll admit I was taken back at how easy it was.

Since then I’ve coached hundreds of clients to eat three (or four) meals a day. And they shed fat like crazy, without a ton of struggle, willpower and effort. Most of them have come to me from other trainers or coaching programs that had them eating much more often. Some people are shocked that I would suggest changing that frequent eating habit of theirs. But when I get them leaner than anyone else has without struggle, when they feel more energetic, freed from food obsession, and then start seeing their muscle definition appear….they are believers. The proof is in the abs, so to speak.

Again, if 6 meals is working for you, awesome. Enjoy! But it’s not the only way, and if you haven’t been able to reach your goals in a sane, maintainable way, it might not be the best solution for you.

Metabolic Shift in Fuel Utilization

One adaptation that comes with frequent feeding (whether you call it snacking or small meals) is that the body’s utilization of fuel moves more toward carbohydrate oxidation, with less fat oxidation. Being a carb burner is fine, as long as you keep eating every few hours and have no trouble staying lean.  However, if you’ve ever felt your blood sugar tumble you know the sensation is not a polite suggestion to eat, your animalistic brain takes over and it’s FOOD. NOW. If you’re burning predominantly carbohydrates, when they run low (such as a meal getting skipped or delayed) you are at risk of that glucoprivic feeding response.

On the flip side, the ability to burn more fat for fuel leads to more blood glucose stability. When your body turns up the fat mobilization pathways (which it does when you switch to fewer meals), if you miss a meal, your body just mobilizes fatty acids from storage sites and starts burning them for fuel. No mayday scenario. No shakes or dizziness or raiding your neighbor’s candy stash in desperation. Just a normal hunger, that approaches slowly and without bells and whistles.

Bottom line: When the intervals between meals are lengthened into the 5-6 hour range, that cues the body to turn up its use of fat for fuel.  Becoming fat-adapted normalizes appetite, making it easier to lose bodyfat.

I’ll be too hungry! I’m already hungry in 2 hours…

Solution: Eat more at meals. You can’t eat only three meals a day when they are tiny. That’s called torture. When you give yourself permission to eat to satisfaction and choose a filling meal with protein, fats and fibrous carbohydrates, you don’t need to eat more than 3 or 4 times a day. You’ll see. Try it out one meal at a time. Set your emotional fear aside (I’ll get fat in one day!) and let yourself eat until comfortably satisfied at breakfast. Notice how long until you are hungry again.

Benefits of Intermittent Fasting…without the really long fast

Small frequent meals don’t give us enough hours between meals to get into a real fasted state. When we get truly into that fasted state, a lot of things happen: insulin levels reach their lowest, fatty acids are released from our fat stores, ghrelin production from the stomach increases, and the body generally moves into a state of breaking down fats for fuel and releasing glucose from stored glycogen. In fact, when you don’t eat for 12 hours or so, your body gradually shifts over to burning more fats. Up to 80% of fuel usage after a 12 hour overnight fast is fat.

Eating very often prevents the body from ever getting into that state. Insulin doesn’t come all the way down, which prevents fatty acid release from fat storage sites. It stays locked up there. And the brain is constantly getting mixed signals, some signs indicate that food has come in, but with a mini meal, not enough things happen to fully engage the circuits that shut appetite off. So the brain’s “fullness center” in the hypothalamus doesn’t get completely activated, and appetite returns sooner than would be appropriate for the caloric load consumed.

Mini meals or snacks are like using a dimmer switch for the brain’s appetite center – just making hunger a bit duller several times per day without ever turning it off. Repeated many times, this causes the hunger and fullness sensations to blur.

Logistics

Behaviorally, it’s just plain easier to overeat if you give yourself 6 times a day to do so.

Eating three meals a day gives us more time to work, play, love, meditate, dance the samba, hassle your boss, or do whatever else is part of your life.

We crave contentment and satisfaction. Using willpower does not work forever, and trying to eat meals that are not large enough to satisfy us on a physical level creates an emotional stress that WILL eventually be relieved. Often as a big meal. And with a carb-favoring metabolism, that big meal will likely be stored as fat.

You don’t need a pre-workout feeding to perform well in the gym. If you eat an adequate post-exercise meal with ample carbohydrates and protein, your muscles will be replenished and that fuel will be ready to go to take you through the next day’s workout. Food you eat immediately before a training session is not available as fuel anyway until it is digested and assimilated.

If you’ve hit a standstill or plateau on 6 meals per day and aren’t losing any fat, but can’t tolerate any more hunger, I recommend adjusting your plan to more substantial meals, but only having 3 or 4 of them.

Want an expert coach to help you nail it? Check out our coaching services so you don’t have to go it alone.

Want all the latest advice, coaching news, and recipes from AskGeorgie? Enter your email address below and hit Sign Me Up! (No spam, just useful stuff.)

Print Friendly

{ 13 comments… add one }

  • Jackie January 13, 2013, 5:29 am

    I follow you on Facebook and was intrigued by this story – I’ve never heard ANYONE say this, but you back it up with some really good logic & evidence, not to mention your personal experiences. I know the feeling of stressing over food, watching the clock to see if it was “time” yet, but I always felt silly for watching the clock instead of listening to my body. Might be just what I needed, thanks for sharing!

  • Dillon January 13, 2013, 11:32 am

    Good article and I agree with your recommendation. How did we get to a point where almost every trainer was recommending 6 meals a day? Was there ever any actual research to backup this approach?
    Thanks, Dillon

  • Sarah Campbell January 13, 2013, 11:33 am

    Hi Georgie!
    I hope all is well with you!
    Great article!
    I have been eating 3 meals & 1 snack for several months, and like it so much better. I also sleep better without that 8pm mini meal.
    Keep up the good work!

  • Sue January 13, 2013, 5:38 pm

    Well done! In LE, eating more frequently was the only habit I ignored. I am a 3-4 meal a day eater and lost 30lbs in six months. Good whole foods, exercise and attitude.

  • Terry January 14, 2013, 10:26 am

    Great article! Thanks for sharing. Does skipping a pre workout snack apply if you train first thing in the morning?

  • Georgie January 14, 2013, 11:42 am

    Terry- It depends on how you feel. Many of my clients who work out before breakfast have a snack or meal before, but many also dont’ feel like they need it as long as they get a good high carb, high protein meal immediately afterwards. If you want to determine what’s best for you (to maximize training but also not take in extra cals if you don’t need them), start with making sure your post workout meal is as soon after training as you can, and is high in both carbs and protein (roughly double the carbs to protein, so 50 g and 25g ballpark). Then, see how you feel if you head into the gym without a preworkout snack the next day. If you feel fine, you don’t need the snack. If your workout suffers, then have something small in the morning before going, or add a during-workout shake or drink.

  • GiGi Eats Celebrities January 17, 2013, 9:45 pm

    I have never believed in the whole 6-meal a day business. If I did, I would probably be 20 pounds heavier than I am because I eat pretty large meals regardless of how many I allow myself in a day. I do better when I eat one to two meals a day. Each to their own, but that’s what I am sticking with!

  • Emma January 20, 2013, 10:44 am

    I found your blog through gokaleo, and had to comment! I love what you are saying, I wish more people would write about these weird myths, and how they are just that, myths, not the truth.

    I’ve been lean all my life, very healthy, never even got the flu in ten years, and I had so much energy. I ate just twice a day, somedays I ate just once, because that’s what I loved, I was always satisfied with food, and never thought about it much.

    Then lo and behold, I decided to try out eating 5 times a day, because of a stupid diet book. What happened was that I got very tired, overweight, started having inflammation problems, food obsessed to the point of ridiculous, I ate like this for 2 years, and hated it! But the stupid book promised that I would be in the best shape of my life after getting used eating so often, and protein at every meal. I don’t know, looking back, why the book hooked me, I think I was afraid after reading it, that I was doing everything wrong, and that the book had all the answers.

    The last year I ate 5 times a day I had the flu 6 times! Imagine that, and also I got arthritis. I couldn’t even exercise anymore, I was sure I was dying. I also got estrogen problems, like uterine fibroids, my periods were massive :(

    I ditched it all half an year ago, and started eating twice a day again ( I also ditched all diet advice, and started eating everything I wanted), omg how satisfying it was, I was instantly more relaxed. Now I am almost back to being as lean as before, without trying, my estrogen problems have vanished (the fibroids are shrinking, and my periods are back to normal), I can sleep again, I haven’t been sick once, my inflammation is gone.

    I am so happy that it was this easy to reverse all the damage done, and I learned a hard, hard lesson about trusting your own body, and what it wants, and not some diet book.

  • Kaitlin March 27, 2013, 7:37 pm

    Hi Georgie :-)

    I’m wondering if you might be able to help me with something. I work two different shifts at work with no “lunch break”: 7:30am-3pm and 1pm-7pm. I don’t take a full lunch break so that I can leave earlier and come in later, but I’m finding that in the middle of the work days, I’m hungry but unable to make a meal for myself. I usually just whip up yogurt with granola or an apple with PB, but these never REALLY satisfy and I’m hungry 3-4 hours later. Perhaps I’m giving this too much thought and attention, but do you have any recommendations for ways to get enough fat/nutrients at each meal? I’m noticing I eat at 7ish, then at 3:30 when I get off and again at around 6-7. There’s a HUGE break in the middle of my day. Same goes with my 1-7 shift, I eat at 8, 12 and 7:30. I’m noticing I eat the bulk of my calories between 7-9 in the evening….

    This might be rambling but I’m genuinely frustrated by my eating habits and am yearning to lose quite a few unwanted lbs.

    Any help or advice would be appreciated :-)

  • Jen April 4, 2013, 7:01 am

    What do you recommend doing to get through the shakes, nausea, low energy that come when you are trying to tease out “real hunger?”

  • Georgie April 4, 2013, 7:53 am

    Jen – I’d eat something to help quell those symptoms once they hit. I don’t expect anyone to just sit through a bad hypoglycemic episode – they are HELL! What I’d do is work toward preventing them by gradually increasing fats in meals (along with overall meal size just slightly) and gradually letting your body adapt to longer intervals between meals. Give it time to adjust.

    But if you’re already quaking and sick, eat something small (like 15 g carb plus 10 g protein)

  • Julia June 8, 2013, 10:30 am

    Great article!

    I can attest to the fact that eating less often helps with fat loss (and regaining sanity). I only wonder if this approach is ideal for me because I have PCOS and am trying to get my acne under control. According to what I’ve read, blood sugar imbalance could be a culprit because it can lead to higher testosterone levels in women. I don’t know if this still holds true but I’ve been told that frequent eating helps with balancing blood sugar but you mentioned “On the flip side, the ability to burn more fat for fuel leads to more blood glucose stability”.

    Does this mean that eating 3-4x a day could be better for managing blood sugar?

    Thanks!

  • Bobby June 23, 2013, 8:57 am

    Finally someone dispells the truth about the metabolism. Eating the right food, fruits and veggies instead of crackers and potatoe chips is key too.